Review Process
Overview
The review process ensures quality content on the platform while protecting both artists and readers. This guide explains how to submit your content for review, understand the review workflow, and respond to feedback effectively.
Understanding the Review System
Why Reviews Are Required
Quality Assurance
- Content Standards: Ensure all content meets platform guidelines
- Reader Protection: Prevent inappropriate or low-quality content
- Artist Support: Provide feedback to improve content quality
- Platform Integrity: Maintain high standards across all content
Review Types
Comic Reviews
- When Required: Before first publication
- Scope: Overall comic quality, cover art, description
- Focus: Content appropriateness, visual quality, story coherence
Chapter Reviews
- When Required: Before chapter publication
- Scope: Individual chapter content and quality
- Focus: Art quality, story progression, technical standards
Review Criteria
Content Quality
- Art Standards: High-quality, clear artwork
- Story Coherence: Logical narrative progression
- Character Development: Engaging, well-developed characters
- Pacing: Appropriate story rhythm and flow
Platform Guidelines
- Age Appropriateness: Content matches stated rating
- Community Standards: Respectful, non-harmful content
- Copyright Compliance: Original or properly licensed content
- Technical Requirements: Proper formatting and file quality
Requesting Reviews
Preparing for Review
Before Submitting
- Complete Content: Ensure all required information is filled
- Quality Check: Review artwork and story quality
- Guideline Compliance: Verify content meets platform standards
- Technical Requirements: Check file formats and sizes
Required Elements
For Comics
- Complete Profile: Title, description, categories
- Visual Assets: Cover, main, and thumbnail images
- At Least One Chapter: Must have content to review
- Proper Settings: Adult content, language, status
For Chapters
- Complete Information: Title, description, chapter number
- High-Quality Images: Clear, properly formatted artwork
- Appropriate Content: Matches comic rating and description
- Technical Quality: Proper file sizes and formats
Submitting for Review
Comic Review Request
- Navigate to Comic: Go to your comic's detail page
- Check Requirements: Ensure all elements are complete
- Request Review: Click "Request Review" button
- Confirmation: Receive confirmation of submission
- Wait for Response: Platform team will review content
Chapter Review Request
- Navigate to Chapter: Go to chapter detail page
- Verify Content: Check all information and images
- Request Review: Click "Request Review" button
- Confirmation: Receive submission confirmation
- Wait for Response: Review team will evaluate content
Review Status Tracking
Understanding Status Changes
Requested Review
- Meaning: Content submitted for review
- Duration: Typically 1-3 business days
- Actions: Wait for admin response, prepare for feedback
In Review
- Meaning: Admin team actively evaluating content
- Duration: Usually 24-48 hours
- Actions: Wait for review completion
Review Complete
- Outcome: Approved or requires changes
- Next Steps: Publish if approved, revise if needed
Review Workflow
Step-by-Step Process
1. Submission
- Artist submits content for review
- System notifies admin team
- Content enters review queue
2. Initial Assessment
- Admin reviews basic requirements
- Checks for guideline compliance
- Evaluates content quality
3. Detailed Review
- Comprehensive content evaluation
- Art quality assessment
- Story and character analysis
4. Decision
- Approval for publication
- Request for revisions
- Rejection with explanation
5. Notification
- Artist receives review results
- Feedback provided if needed
- Next steps communicated
Timeline Expectations
Standard Review Times
- Comic Reviews: 2-3 business days
- Chapter Reviews: 1-2 business days
- Rush Reviews: Available for urgent content (contact support)
Factors Affecting Timeline
- Content Complexity: Longer stories may take more time
- Review Queue: High volume may extend wait times
- Revision Cycles: Multiple revisions extend total time
- Platform Events: Special events may affect review capacity
Responding to Review Feedback
Understanding Feedback
Common Review Comments
Content Quality
- Art Improvements: Suggestions for visual enhancements
- Story Development: Recommendations for narrative improvement
- Character Consistency: Notes on character portrayal
- Pacing Issues: Feedback on story rhythm
Technical Issues
- File Quality: Image resolution or format problems
- Upload Issues: Missing or corrupted files
- Formatting Problems: Layout or presentation issues
- Metadata Issues: Missing or incorrect information
Policy Compliance
- Content Rating: Age appropriateness concerns
- Community Guidelines: Content policy violations
- Copyright Issues: Intellectual property concerns
- Platform Standards: Quality or formatting requirements
Making Revisions
Addressing Feedback
Art Quality Issues
- Resolution Problems: Increase image quality
- Format Issues: Convert to supported formats
- Consistency Problems: Maintain visual style
- Technical Problems: Fix upload or display issues
Content Improvements
- Story Enhancements: Improve narrative elements
- Character Development: Strengthen character portrayal
- Pacing Adjustments: Optimize story flow
- Engagement Factors: Increase reader interest
Policy Compliance
- Content Rating: Adjust for appropriate audience
- Guideline Adherence: Remove problematic content
- Copyright Resolution: Ensure proper licensing
- Platform Standards: Meet quality requirements
Resubmitting Content
- Make Revisions: Address all feedback points
- Quality Check: Review changes before resubmission
- Resubmit: Request review again
- Wait for Response: Allow time for re-evaluation
- Iterate if Needed: Continue until approved
Best Practices
Before Submission
Quality Assurance
- Self-Review: Evaluate your own content critically
- Peer Feedback: Get input from other artists
- Guideline Review: Ensure compliance with platform policies
- Technical Check: Verify all technical requirements
Preparation
- Complete Information: Fill out all required fields
- High-Quality Assets: Use professional-grade images
- Consistent Style: Maintain visual and narrative coherence
- Appropriate Content: Match content to stated rating
During Review Process
Communication
- Be Patient: Allow adequate time for review
- Stay Available: Respond promptly to feedback
- Ask Questions: Clarify any unclear feedback
- Be Professional: Maintain respectful communication
Documentation
- Keep Records: Save review feedback and responses
- Track Changes: Document revisions made
- Learn Patterns: Identify common feedback themes
- Improve Process: Use feedback to enhance future content
After Approval
Publication
- Monitor Performance: Track reader engagement
- Respond to Feedback: Address reader comments
- Maintain Quality: Keep standards high for future content
- Build on Success: Use approved content as foundation
Common Issues and Solutions
Review Delays
Causes
- High Volume: Many submissions in queue
- Complex Content: Longer or more complex reviews needed
- Technical Issues: Platform or system problems
- Staff Availability: Limited reviewer capacity
Solutions
- Plan Ahead: Submit content well before deadlines
- Contact Support: Inquire about delays if excessive
- Consider Timing: Avoid peak submission periods
- Be Patient: Allow standard review times
Rejection Handling
Common Reasons
- Quality Issues: Content doesn't meet standards
- Policy Violations: Content violates platform guidelines
- Technical Problems: File or formatting issues
- Incomplete Submissions: Missing required elements
Response Strategies
- Understand Feedback: Carefully read rejection reasons
- Make Improvements: Address all identified issues
- Seek Clarification: Ask for specific guidance if needed
- Resubmit Confidently: Ensure quality before resubmission
Appeal Process
When to Appeal
- Unclear Feedback: Rejection reasons unclear
- Disputed Decisions: Believe content meets standards
- Technical Errors: System or process problems
- Policy Questions: Need clarification on guidelines
Appeal Process
- Contact Support: Reach out through ticket system
- Provide Details: Explain specific concerns
- Include Evidence: Reference relevant guidelines or examples
- Be Professional: Maintain respectful communication
- Accept Decision: Respect final determination
Advanced Tips
Optimizing Review Success
Content Strategy
- Study Guidelines: Understand platform requirements thoroughly
- Learn from Feedback: Use review comments to improve
- Build Relationships: Develop rapport with review team
- Stay Current: Keep up with policy and guideline changes
Technical Excellence
- Master Tools: Become proficient with upload and editing tools
- Quality Standards: Maintain high technical standards
- File Management: Organize content efficiently
- Backup Systems: Keep copies of all content
Professional Development
- Continuous Learning: Improve skills based on feedback
- Community Engagement: Learn from other artists
- Industry Awareness: Stay informed about trends and standards
- Skill Development: Enhance artistic and technical abilities
Getting Help
Support Resources
Documentation
- Platform Guidelines: Review content policies
- Technical Guides: Learn about tools and processes
- Best Practices: Study successful content examples
- FAQ Section: Find answers to common questions
Community Support
- Artist Forums: Connect with other creators
- Peer Review: Get feedback from fellow artists
- Mentorship: Learn from experienced creators
- Collaboration: Work with other artists
Official Support
- Help Desk: Contact platform support team
- Review Team: Communicate with content reviewers
- Technical Support: Get help with platform issues
- Policy Questions: Clarify guidelines and requirements
Ready to manage your earnings? Continue to Payout Management to learn about tracking revenue and receiving payments.